yes, for sure .40 has more recoil than a .45. .40 and 357Sig are high pressure rounds. 2 different kinds of recoil. .45 had a hard solid recoil. .40 has an aggresive snappier recoil.
For sure . I let my rebuilt elbows do the talking. Little big bores are the least shot at the range for me. After a mag or 2 from a glock 27 size gun my hands are worthless for some time. My 22 buck mark is fine. Weed eater and chain saws set me back a couple days. getting old sucks. We won't even get into the eyes.
For sure . I let my rebuilt elbows do the talking. Little big bores are the least shot at the range for me. After a mag or 2 from a glock 27 size gun my hands are worthless for some time. My 22 buck mark is fine. Weed eater and chain saws set me back a couple days. getting old sucks. We won't even get into the eyes.
I am not saying that plenty of people don't exaggerate it but there is a big difference between describing recoil or comparing differences in recoil and whining about it.Every time I hear ".40 cal." and "snappy" in the same sentence I throw up in my mouth a little bit. The recoil impulse of the .40S+W has been so overblown it is almost laughable.
Put your purse down when you are shooting and you'll be fine:favorites37:
Yep, the 357 Sig is snappy, as is the 40. The 45 is a bit more of a shove. What gun they are shot from also makes a big difference.