Oscar Pistorius murder trial

Sgt. Rock

Full Access Member
PRETORIA, South Africa— Oscar Pistorius refused to look at a photo of his dead girlfriend's bloody head wounds while testifying at his murder trial Wednesday as the prosecutor urged the star athlete to ''take responsibility'' for killing her.

''It's time that you look at it,'' chief prosecutor Gerrie Nel said, setting the stage for a rigorous first day of cross-examination of Pistorius, the double-amputee Olympian charged with premeditated murder for shooting Reeva Steenkamp three times through a toilet door at his home.

''I remember,'' Pistorius said of Steenkamp's bloodied head, becoming distraught and then crying as he turned away from the gruesome image of the injuries he inflicted that were displayed next to him in a packed courtroom in South Africa's capital.

Nel said Steenkamp's head ''exploded'' when it was struck by one of four hollow-point bullets that Pistorius fired through the door on Feb. 14, 2013 with his 9 mm pistol. The showing of the photograph on TV screens in the courtroom caused gasps among spectators, who included Steenkamp's mother, June. The police photo showed a side view of the dead model and reality TV star's head, with a mass of blood and human tissue on the back and upper parts. Her eyes were closed.

''I will not look at a picture where I'm tormented by what I saw and felt that night,'' Pistorius said. ''As I picked Reeva up, my fingers touched her head. I remember. I don't have to look at a picture, I was there.''

Pistorius, 27, says he shot Steenkamp in the pre-dawn hours on Valentine's Day - in the head, arm and hip - by mistake thinking she was a dangerous intruder behind the door in his bathroom about to come out and attack him. Prosecutors charge he killed the 29-year-old intentionally, and Nel aggressively questioned Pistorius for the first time.

Just curious readers about your opinions of him. Is he guilty with first degree murder?..or as he has claimed he "accidently" shot her thinking she was an intruder in the house. Or maybe some other motive??? Seems to be the murder trial of South Africa of the century.
 

kwo51

Full Access Member
I guess they don't teach making sure of you target before shooting. I know it is a different culture there but common sense has its place. Murder 2 IMO. Damn shame lose of life.
 

SilvrSRT10

Super Moderator
Just curious readers about your opinions of him. Is he guilty with first degree murder?..or as he has claimed he "accidently" shot her thinking she was an intruder in the house. Or maybe some other motive??? Seems to be the murder trial of South Africa of the century.

My gut opinion is (and that's all it is) he meant to kill her.

1). I believe there were reports of them having violent arguments prior to this.

2). Who shoots blindly through a door thinking there "might" be an intruder on the other side?

3). Before you went into Rambo mode wouldn't you make damn sure where your other family members/loved ones were before you opened fire?

I've not been keeping details on the case but from what I've heard so far I'm not buying his story.
 

Jo6pak

Full Access Member
I haven't really been following it much either. But form what I have heard, it does sound a bit fishy.

Sadly, this is another case of letting the reporters into a court room. Which always seems to lead to letting justice and truth out of the courtroom.
It's my belief that there should NEVER be news cameras in any court of law.
 

GLOCK V

Full Access Member
Sounds like this guy is kinda fucked up in the head... Did he yell " Put down my toothbrush! Mother Fucker!"
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top