Search results

Not a bad idea and it would certainly solve the magazine loading issue. I have actually considered the idea of an older S&W.

She is in her 60's and has arthritis. For now, she is borrowing my Glock 19. For the most part, she does ok with it and doesn't mind the recoil but it does cause her arthritis to act up and she has more difficulty loading the magazines than anything else. I am sure the magazine issue could be...

Yeah, cost is a definite downside and the main reason I put it off for so long. It just seemed a shame to keep putting up with such a mediocre trigger on such a great gun. It definitely improved my accuracy and made the gun more fun to shoot.

Next to a Glock 43 for comparison

Well, after debating about it for a long time, I finally upgraded the trigger on my M&P. It now has the Apex full kit, flat faced trigger, and newer style sear. The reset on the original trigger was non existent. The new trigger is not only a little lighter but much shorter and crisper and...

I actually got off work at a decent time today and decided to stop by the range. I wanted to see if they had an M&P 380 for my wife to try later. I was also thinking about trying a CM9 again to upgrade my pocket gun. They sold their CM9 and don't currently have an M&P 380 but are supposed to...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OSodRtHHmo

I love GP100's

www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcnoFE7Dc68

www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5capbhKlVA

Took her out to the range today and overall, I am pretty pleased. I took some Tula, old Barnaul soft points, and steel cased Monarch that my local Academy carries. The Tula was a fail. Accuracy was less than the other two and inconsistent primer depth led to repeated failures to fire, even...

That is a good question. IMHO, it is mostly about personal preference. That said, I do prefer handguns without a manual safety for defensive use. Glocks obviously fit that bill. Personally, I am fond of the S&W M&P and the 2.0 is supposed to have a better trigger. I also love revolvers. My...

Weapons of war is another term misused and exploited by Democrats. It is also completely useless for describing how a firearm operates. A 1911 pistol is, without question, a weapon of war. It is also a wonderful sidearm and target pistol. The bolt action mauser in my safe is a weapon of war...

Actually, assault weapon is a made up term. It's purpose, of course, is purely political and intentionally deceptive just like full semiautomatic.

Just found out that vortex offers a similar reticle once you get up to their Diamondback tactical.

Why has no one done this before? With all the BDC type reticles out there, why has no one else simply used an MOA scale like all the ballistics chart use? I know there have been plenty of mil dot reticles but I believe this is the first MOA reticle I have heard of. Primary Arms 4-14X44mm...