Glad to see the snow gone. Everybody us AR's?
Most guys do.
But we usually have at least one guy per class show up with an AK.
The ergonomics of the AK are not as good as an AR so its harder/slower for those guys to switch the safety on when they bound.
We had a 71 yr old Korean War vet with a Garand one time.
He was surprisingly agile and did well.
But his 8 rds clip made it harder for him to supply suppressive fire for hs buddy when he bounded.
All in all there are many reasons for a serious tactical dude to stick with AR:
- Its most common so u and your buddy cna toss each other mags in a firefight to crossload
- Since its so common dead enemy can be a resupply point
(usually our classes range from 17-60, the older dudes of course exercise as much as they can for 2-3 months to get ready before they come.
When they dont its a problem.
We had older dudes be VERY successful before but last weekend we had a 73yr old guy who didnt prepare at all and it was a problem.
He had to sit a lot of stuff out.
When you do this kind of stuff you can see 20 yr olds out of breath too.
However anaerobic capacity is just as important if not more so than aerobic ( cardio) capacity.. and you lose anaerobic capacity at a lesser rate than aerobic with ageing... I once read anaerobic peaks in males in the early 40's.(!) not sure if its true . But we have had a number of 40 somethings who do better than some 20 yr old soldiers that I have seen.
This is serious training.
All pics are non staged and show real students learning ( hence some intervals are off etc)