Home protection or murder???

oppo

Full Access Member
Hamline University School of Law professor Joseph Olson, who has studied self-defense laws, noted that the number of Smith's shots will make it difficult for him to claim self-defense in court.

"I think the first shot is justified," Olson said. "After the person is no longer a threat because they're seriously wounded, the application of self-defense is over."
This riche hear is what ya call uh edjumecated idjut. ^^^

Wounded has nothing to do with it. The only thing that matters is the threat and a person can indeed be a serious threat after far more than one shot.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Top